News Room

Time’s Up: CRA’s 100 Day Mandate for Improvement

After years of frustration on the part of tax professionals and taxpayers alike, the Finance Minister ordered the Canada Revenue Agency to clean up its act in 100 days. Specifically, the improvement plan was to run from September 2 through December 11. Finance Minister and Minister of National Revenue, Francoise-Phillippe Champagne instructed CRA to fix “unacceptable wait times and service delays.” Time’s up this week and CRA has released an update on progress. What gets measured, gets done. Let’s see what CRA’s metrics show. 

RRIF Recontributions Possible Until April 14

Taxpayers who withdrew funds from their RRIFs in 2008 may recontribute 25% of their minimum amounts and earn a tax deduction on the 2008 tax return for doing so, but only if they make the recontribution by April 14. Financial advisors, tax advisors and their clients should take note of this opportunity this week.

Report Card: Inter-Provincial Tax Havens 2009

With the release of the Alberta Budget, Canadians may be interested to take a good close look at the tax advantages offered by our various provincial governments and how they rate with each other, as per the Alberta Budget Papers. There are a variety of tax perks   for various income and family profiles, depending on your province of residence ó all very worthwhile reviewing if you are thinking of a move in 2009. Remember it is your province of residence as at December 31, 2009 which determines your provincial taxation for the whole year. Below, The Knowledge Bureau offers its Top Marks for Inter-Provincial Personal Tax Havens for 2009: TAX FREE ZONES: TAXATION OF NON-DISCRETIONARY INCOME. When it comes to tax free zones, Alberta wins for both couples and singles. With a personal amount of $16,775 and an identical spouse amount, the first $33,550 of taxable income earned by a working couple in Alberta is free of provincial tax. To be meaningful from an equity point of view, the cost of living for each province (in both urban and rural areas) requires assessment. The desired result is that income below the poverty line not be taxed as all earnings are required for food, clothing and shelter; and there is likely no non-discretionary income. Provincial refundable tax credits may make up the difference, however, to stimulate both spending and saving, having more after tax dollars at hand throughout the year is a more immediate way to stimulate both. Provincial Rank Personal Amount Spousal Amount Couples Tax Free Zone 1. Alberta $16,775 $16,775 $33,550 2. Sask. $13,269 $13,269 $26,538 3. Quebec $10,455 $10,455 $20,910 4. BC $9,373 $8,026 $17,399 5. Ontario $8,881 $7,541 $16,422 6. Manitoba $8,134 $8,134 $16,268 7. New Brunswick $8,605 $7,307 $15,912 8. Nova Scotia $7,981 $6,778 $14,459 9. PEI $7,708 $6,546 $14,254 10. NL $7,778 $6,356 $14,134 FEDERAL $10,320 $10,320 $20,640 LOWEST INDIVIDUAL TAX RATES. If you are low income earner, it pays to live in BC; next to Quebec, (which features an abatement of 16.5% of basic federal tax in lieu of federal cash transfers), it is low income earners in Saskatchewan that pay the highest taxes and high income earners in Nova Scotia that pay the most. Provincial Rank Tax Rate: Low income Bracket Tax Rate: Highest income bracket Top combined federal and provincial rate 1. BC 5.06% AB 10% AB 39% 2. ON 6.05% ON 11.16% & Surtax BC 43.70% 3. NL 7.70% BC 14.70% SK 44% 4. NS 8.79% SK 15% NL 44.5% 5. NB 9.65% NL 15.50% NB 46% 6. PEI 9.80% PEI 16.70% & Surtax MB 46.40% 7. AB 10.0% NB 17.0% ON 46.41% 8. MB 10.8% MB 17.4% PEI 47.37% 9. SK 11% NS 17.5% & Surtax PQ 48.22% 10. PQ 16% PQ 24% NS 48.25% LOWEST COMBINED FEDERAL/PROVINCE TAX RATES: The winner is Alberta at 39% and the Loser is Nova Scotia at 48.25%. Next time: Comparing Interprovincial Tax and Health Care Insurance Premiums and the Inter-Provincial Business Tax Environment

Forms Update - T3 Schedule 5

With new forms appearing on the CRA website weekly, sometime even daily, it requires a fair amount of due diligence to stay current with all of the updated forms and guides. Recently, the CRA released an updated Form T3SCH5 which incorporates Form T657, Calculation of Capital Gains Deduction.  This updated version of Schedule 5 of the T3 Trust Return has had extensive modifications made to it, and requests more detailed information regarding the capital gains deduction and in what period the gains occurred. The T3 Schedule 5 is used to calculate the capital gains deduction for a spousal or common law partner's trust for the tax year in which the beneficiary spouse (or common-law partner) died. The updated form includes the calculation in the year of death for the unused lifetime capital gains deduction limits. The completed schedule must be filed with the trust's return. To view the new form, click here.

Alberta Budget - Released April 7, 2009

The 2009 Alberta budget was tabled on April 7, 2009. The budget was, for the most part, a spending budget running a deficit of $4.7 Billion with deficits expected for the next two budgets. Alberta Seniors' BenefitThe Alberta Senior's Benefit which is paid to low-income seniors will increase by 11.9% for 2009 to a maximum of $40 per month for singles and $60 per month for couples. Assured Income for the Severely Handicapped (AISH)The budget announced an increase of $100 in the maximum monthly benefit to AISH recipients. No other new personal or corporate income tax changes were announced. Liquor and TobaccoTobacco taxes were increased by $3 per carton effective midnight April 7. Effective immediately the liquor markup goes up by $1.30 for a dozen beer from a major brewer, by at least 75 cents for a 750 millilitre bottle of wine and by $2.85 for a 750 millilitre bottle of most spirits.

The SST: Removal of Hidden Taxes Can Help Consumers By Reducing Business Costs

By Alan Rowell , DFA, Tax Specialist and President, The Accounting Place The SST will ease credit crunch and stimulate Ontario's and Canada's global competitive advantages, and that's good news for consumers. The Ontario Budget 2009 announced tax reform and a move from an antiquated RST format to a value-added format. This has created an immediate backlash from consumers across the province based on what has been labeled everything from a tax grab to open larceny. Few have contemplated why this move is so important at this time. In fact, by eliminating RST on July 1, 2010 the Province of Ontario will implement the greatest single overall cost cutting measure for Ontario business. The question is, will today's business leaders and smart consumers be savvy enough to support this important initiative to make it pay off for all Canadians? It would pay to take some time to understand this initiative more fully. In order to best understand the effects the Single Sales Tax (SST) will have on the residents of Ontario, you must first understand the Retail Sales Tax (RST) system that is currently in place, and how it actually affects us on an everyday basis. Each level of the supply chain, from raw materials, through manufacturing, distribution and retailers have paid RST on every item they consume, just like any other resident of Ontario. The RST adds 8% to the costs of all these items, not just once, but continuously through the system until the product reaches the consumer. A 2007 policy paper issued by CD Howe Institute places these ìhidden RST costsî at more than 40% of all RST collected in Ontario[1]. After all this tax on tax, the consumer then pays an additional 8%! This is a costly and inefficient system borne on the backs of business, when you then take into account the heavy bookkeeping and accounting costs of collecting two taxes for two levels of government. It makes us uncompetitive in relation to the rest of the world with which we must compete and that affects our ability to keep industriesólike the auto industry for exampleóin Canada. Removal of the RST from the chain will result in reduced costs to each level and therefore by extension, should produce lower pricing to the consumer. The Ontario Chamber of Commerce estimates that the reduction in costs resulting from this change at five billion dollars[2]. The consumer will still pay the SST, but on a lower end value than before SST implementation. More important it will again give us a competitive advantage globally. Consider the following: COMPLIANCE COSTS The removal of the outdated RST system will reduce duplication and the cost of complying with Ontario RST legislation of between $100 million[3] and $500 million[4]. This is resulting from Ontario business following one set of rules and dealing with one government agency (CRA), rather than the duplication currently in effect. Reduction in Ontario businesses compliance costs will further reduce pricing to the consumer. MANUFACTURING Ontario has seen their manufacturing industries seriously hurt over the past years through declining exports, loss of jobs and shutdowns. Under the current RST system manufacturers not only pay RST on their purchases; they are also required to calculate and remit RST on the ìmanufactured costî of their product. This is calculated on the total cost of manufacturing the product including labour, machinery, equipment, supplies and a list that can go on and on. All these costs are then pro-rated based on the square footage of the manufacturing operation and charged an 8% RST component. This results in higher costs to the manufacturer and therefore a higher cost to the consumer. EXPORTS The RST built into the cost of manufacturing outlined above results in an increased cost of goods manufactured for export. When specifically looking at the automotive and steel manufacturers, the reduction in manufactured costs by removal of the RST will improve the competitiveness, most notably against the Great Lake States, of operating these businesses in Ontario and bring in dollars from outside of Ontario. NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The Canada Mortgage and Housing Agency[5] has calculated that the cost of RST built into new home construction is between 2 and 3 percent of the value of the home. As the cost to build the home will be reduced by eliminating this input cost, the budget allows for a rebate of 75% (8% RST minus 2% cost reduction) of the SST paid on a new home, up to $400,000. Home between $400,000 and $500,000 will receive a phased-out rebate becoming totally eliminated at $500,000. Homes in excess of $500,000 will be subject to SST in full. SERVICE INDUSTRIES Ontario residents will see an increase in the ìcash out of pocketî for service related industries. Service industries, such as lawyers, accountants and veterinarians have never been required to collect RST on behalf of the government. This is due to the fact that the services are not considered a product, but consist of knowledge and labour. While service industries will also benefit from some reduced costs, the effects will not be the same as their major expense is wages. Reality states that the Ontario government cannot reduce RST on manufactured goods and compliance costs without making up the funds somewhere. This is a cost of doing business; there is a lower impact to collect $1 from $100 people than to collect $100 from one person. Broadening of the tax base results in the lowering of prices on some products and services while raising the end cost on others. The background documentation in the Ontario Budget 2009 shows that an anticipated over-all decrease in RST revenues will result and is projected to be $121 million[6]. SMALL TO MEDIUM BUSINESSES The budget acknowledges, for the first time from any level of government, something that small to medium sized businesses in Ontario have already known. The Ontario Budget 2009 states, ìCanadian businesses have had difficulty accessing capital markets for financing, and have had to rely more on bank lending. However, the Bank of Canada's Senior Loan Officer Survey reported ongoing tightening in both the pricing and availability of credit[7].î Regardless of continuing announcements of increased funding availability from the Federal Government, small to medium sized businesses, which make up 54% of Ontario businesses, have experienced the same economic slow down as everyone else. Because the businesses are hurting, they no longer qualify for loans from financial lending institutions to assist them with their everyday expenses[8]. The reduction in compliance costs and embedded RST costs will put much needed cash into the hands of small to medium business - the backbone of the Ontario economy. TRANSITION: GOOD FOR CONSUMERS TOO! All of the above items will not happen overnight. It will take time for the full effects of the SST to be felt in the marketplace. In order to address this issue, the budget puts two consumer related credit benefits into effect. Ontario Sales Tax Transition Benefit results in direct payment to Ontario residents of $300 for individuals or $1,000 for families. The credits are income tested and will require residents to file their 2009 personal tax return in order to receive the cash allowances. Ontario Sales Tax Transition Benefit Payment Month Single Individuals Single Parents or Couples

Manitoba - Some Future Budget Considerations

By Evelyn Jacks, Knowledge Bureau President There was little mention of the global financial crisis in the March 25, 2009 Manitoba provincial budget, the theme of which was steady, balanced. In Part 2 of the budget coverage, some future considerations which will affect Manitobans are outlined in the editorial by Evelyn Jacks, below: With Manitoba's diverse economy performing relatively well under the circumstances, the trick for Manitoba Finance Minister Selinger will be to pilot this year's "steady, balanced" budget into turbulent waters ahead. Three threats emerge for his consideration: 1. Our aging population. The decline in the share of the population of working age is common to most industrialized countries, but projections by the United Nations show that over the next 25 years, Canada will experience the second largest decline among G7 countries and the fourth largest among all OECD countries. An aging population will add to the shortages of labour that are already developing in our economy, putting downward pressure on living standards. At the same time, the aging of our society will create additional demand for health and social services. How does this relate to our specific standards of living? Tax patterns tell the story: In Manitoba we collect just under $12 billion in revenues with 21% of this coming from personal income taxes, 26% from retail sales, education property taxes and other taxes, 12% from other fees and 6.5% from Government business enterprises. To zero in on the taxation side, here is how this shakes out for individuals: From 2007 data we know that 855,000 Manitobans filed income tax returns, and of these, 556,000 (65%) actually paid MB tax. But who contributes the most to individual tax coffers? Based on a department of finance calculation last done in 2006, using 2003 tax year data, the breakdown looked like this: taxable income up to $30,000: 42% of taxpayers, paying 12% of tax; taxable income $30,000 to $60,000: 42% of taxpayers, paying 39% of tax; taxable income over $60,000: 16% of taxpayers, paying 50% of tax. These folksóyoung professionals and top-of-career baby boomers represent a potentially diminishing tax base, without whose powerful tax dollars our standard of living will be affected. It is important to shore up this tax base to continue the revenue patterns this province has come to rely on. 2. Changes To Transfer Payments. By far the largest revenue line item for government however is federal transfer payments at 32% of total. This reliance on federal transfer payments can represent a large problem we are heading into with full knowledge in the near future, but one that we are seemingly unprepared for. Equalization measures a province's ability to raise revenues and in Manitoba we have previously received the 4th highest amount after PEI, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Nova Scotia. Specifically, changes announced by the federal government on November 3, 2008 would permanently change the Equalization Payment formula by imposing a ceiling on the program. This could be particularly significant here, because Manitoba has enjoyed relatively stronger economic performance in the past several years than most provinces. As a result, Equalization Payments would begin to decline in future yearsóat the same time when tax revenues are expected to decline due to our global economic slowdown. While the impact will be tempered with a protection payment this fiscal year, there appears to be no vision for the longer term impact of such changes. With federal transfers representing almost 32% of provincial revenues, (as compared to personal tax revenues which represent only 21%) Manitoba's standard of living may be at risk in the future in the wake of a disappearing boomer tax base. At the same time, the net per capita debt has risen from $8846 in 2008 to $9142 in 2009óan increase of over 3%. 3. Declining tax revenues ahead. Finally, tax revenues are projected to decline as a result of world economic events. Businesses deal with these scenarios by drastically cutting costs. Government has not done so yet, raising a potential debate between stimulating economies today at the expense of deficits tomorrow. Baby boomers planning for retirement are certainly forward looking, and concerned about their wealth, and that of the country poised to cover their needs in old age. For them, the question to consider is whether temporary tax reductions and deficit spending serve them and their heirs well in the long run? This issue was not addressed in the budget. Next Week: Part 3 - What can we do about this: Building Successful New Economies
 
 
 
Knowledge Bureau Poll Question

It costs a lot more to go to work these days. Should the Canada Employment Credit of $1501 for 2026 be raised higher to account for this?

  • Yes
    36 votes
    87.8%
  • No
    5 votes
    12.2%